Nutter Route

[tobapopalos]

Are you for real?

[willymchilybily]

Originally Posted by tobapopalos

Are you for real?

I dont know if hes trying to troll to save face or doesnt understand that we are saying

using terrorists to kill the innocent gardeners flaking the sa allows the dogs to hit virtually pure sa before they even get to fire. Or for that point any unit that fires after them and isnt flakked with stuff more than innocents. Or isnt armour based.

[Stargazer]

Originally Posted by willymchilybily

I dont know if hes trying to troll to save face or doesnt understand that we are saying

using terrorists to kill the innocent gardeners flaking the sa allows the dogs to hit virtually pure sa before they even get to fire. Or for that point any unit that fires after them and isnt flakked with stuff more than innocents. Or isnt armour based.

I simply didn't understand,no one mentioned the above.But dogs are firing on all,so I've sent a load of SA with a load of hippys/yobs,whats the plan now?

[tobapopalos]

The plan is to laugh at you buying up on hippies and yobs.

[Stargazer]

Ok say I already have many million hippys to stop cyborgs as a solo SA...

Now can you answer me without another pointless sarcy comment?Just trying to learn...

[tobapopalos]

Again, I would laugh at you buying millions of hippies.

Also, bikers?

[Dax]

I'll have to put my oar in here and say that's little much. I'm all for a good roast, but it's gone a bit far now.

I use hippies to flak vs arsonists, and to disable Sgt before firing. They are used to effectively stop CG, and many other little wonders. It's very viable. And Yobs? Obvious Sgt sweep unit.

[Alcibiades]

Sending lots of different types of units against an ALL targeting unit would be good, but leaves you open to possibly getting roasted by other routes. You won't only ever be targetting ALL firing units. If you buy loads of hippies/yobs at the expense of LETs, you are likely to get shattered by someone who has better troops/route. And arguably, it doesn't really matter *what* you send against dogs, if it's not heavily armoured, it's going to die horribly

If you sent a bunch of flak/SAs/Hippies/Yobs at a thug target and he last ticked you with Terrors and Dogs, assuming a relatively even battle, you would kill more dogs since you sent more units to help mitigate the "bite" of the Dogs, but it would still probably cost you more than you would gain, and certainly be more expensive than you'd want!

You'd have to send a lot of units to mitigate the power of the almighty attack dog

[willymchilybily]

Originally Posted by Stargazer

Ok say I already have many million hippys to stop cyborgs as a solo SA...

Now can you answer me without another pointless sarcy comment?Just trying to learn...

Listen you can play how you like and mass what you want this all came about because i said normally blockers or armour defend against a dog/tl.

And we concerened ourselves with last tick as thats when nutters fire. Inkeeping with this now derailed thread. i said nutter could be used more productively preventing nlt bloking units firing rather than trying to stop armoured lethals. This is still true even with you using sa now instead of robo. But by jove wasting sa and mass hippy to try and kill a dog player last tick And at most you will just kill a few dogs after taking damage. Its not gonna be a decicive win. And all this hypothetical bs. Listen if you suddenly mass hippies ill suddenly throw in some bikers. If you get a pom to send as well to stop the dogs and allow you to kill my tl's, ill get some arsonist help. If you mass yobs next ill use hippys, pa and vds.

The game is rock scissor paper. the whole idea is that there are ways and means to get around these things. And im glad your actually realising this! But we cant spend the rest of this thread derailed to try and explain what you could work out for yourself. If you have a specific question just go to help and support. Also when some one does tell you something take it in. Try it out. Learn from them.

[Stargazer]